|
RESEARCH, EVALUATION & INDICATORS -
Evaluation Models
|
|
Saturday, 08 May 2010 12:28 |
Evaluating continuous assessment quality in competence-based education online: the case of the e-folio - Alda Pereira, Isolina Oliveira, Luís Tinoca, Lúcia Amante, Maria de Jesus Relvas, Maria do Carmo Teixeira Pinto & Darlinda Moreira - European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2009
Abstract: From the analyzed e-folios, it becomes clear that the assessed competences were all framed by the concept of competence assumed by this research group, although they are not always presented with a clear formulation. The most valued type of competence was clearly "problem solving". Within this metacompetence, most of the e-folios required the students to "gather and analyze information". The majority of them required the "synthesis of perspectives", while others asked the students to "plan and design a discourse", and demanded the students to "make judgements". Finally, few e-folios required students to "argument and discuss situations/cases", to "confront viewpoints", or to "design a project". Full Text: PDF |
|
|
RESEARCH, EVALUATION & INDICATORS -
Evaluation Models
|
|
Saturday, 06 February 2010 13:34 |
|
ساختار سازی برای ارزیابی کیفیت آموزش عالی ایران: از آرمان تا واقعیت - دکتر عباس بارزگان - 1386
Full Text: PDF
|
|
RESEARCH, EVALUATION & INDICATORS -
Evaluation Models
|
|
Saturday, 06 February 2010 13:18 |
|
Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Quality Assurance Systems: Dimensions of Similarity and Diversity in the Global Experiences [in Persian] - Dr. M. Farasatkhah, Dr. A. Bazargan & Dr. M. Ghazi – Tabatabaie -
1386 ، 2 فصلنامه پژوهش و برنام هريزي در آموز شعالي، شماره 44
Abstract: Comparative analysis of quality assurance systems in higher education through out the world reveals that there are many convergence and consensus on the one hand and considerable diversity on the other hand. “Relation with the government”, “organizational structure”, “ the roles and authorities”, “ the mission”, “criteria for judgment”, “evidences”, “the formal and final decisions based on the evaluation” and “the manner of reporting” are among the points divergence among different systems. This indicates that those in charge of introducing such systems were able to overcome many structural, cultural and contextual obstacles by network building. By creative borrowing from global experiences, these systems have been able to initiate the relevant and indigenous evaluation of higher education systems. Keywords: Higher Education, Quality Assurance, Global Experiences, Convergence, and Diversity.
تحليل مقايسهاي نظامهاي تضمين كيفيت آموزش عالي در جهان: وجوه اشتراك و افتراق در تجربههاي جهاني
دکتر مقصود فراستخواه، دکتر عباس بازرگان ، دکتر محمود قاضی طباطبایی
1386 ، 2 فصلنامه پژوهش و برنام هريزي در آموز شعالي، شماره 44
| چکيده مقاله: |
| نظامهاي تضمين كيفيت آموزشعالي در تجربههاي جهاني با اينكه از برخي وجوه اشتراك كامل و نزديك به اجماع يا وجوه اشتراك نسبي و نزديك به توافق اكثري برخوردارند، اما از جهات زيادي تنوع و گوناگوني بسياري در آنها مشاهده ميشود. وجوه افتراق، عواملي مانند نسبت دولت با اين نظامها، ساختار سازماني آنها، نقشها و اختيارات، مأموريت، معيارهاي قضاوت و مراجع مورد استناد، تصميمگيري نهايي مرتبط با ارزشيابي و نحوة گزارش را شامل ميشود. واسطههاي تغيير و كنشگران جوامع توانستهاند با نحوة بازي خود و با ايجاد شبكهاي از نقشها و تعاملات عاملان انساني، ابتكارات گوناگوني در ارزشيابي كيفيت آموزشعالي كشور خود، ضمن همگرايي با تجربههاي جهاني، داشته باشند. |
|
| واژههاي كليدي: آموزش عالي، تضمين كيفيت، تجربههاي جهاني، تشابهات و تمايزات |
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
